MOVIE NEWS

Thursday, July 2

  • Daniel Radcliffe "Disappointed" by Lack of Darkness in Latest Harry Potter Movie

    Even though David Yates, the newest director to bring the Harry Potter mythos to life, took the franchise on a dark journey in the previous installment, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, the tone is much lighter in the next movie, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

    Apparently, the new tone did not necessarily sit well with all of the cast members. In a recent interview, Daniel Radcliffe, who plays the titular character, said:

    My favourite stuff is always the dark stuff. When I read scripts for the first time that's what I always lean towards and it's what I want to see included – even more so in Harry Potter movies, because we need the films to appeal to adult audiences. In fact one of the things I was disappointed about with the sixth Harry Potter movie was that there wasn't so much of that element.

    Radcliffe said that he had a conversation with Yates about this and was told that it was important to give the audience some comedy. Radcliffe said:

    There are huge opportunities for comedy in the sixth film and we use all of them, even though my natural inclination is not towards that. I love watching comedy but doing it is something else.

    Yates will also be on board as director on the follow-up to Half-Blood, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, which will be split into two movies.


    Posted 07/02/2009 by BrentJS

    Related: Daniel Radcliffe | David Yates | Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone | Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets | Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban | Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix | Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince | Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

  • User Comments

    Please Log in or register to comment on Daniel Radcliffe "Disappointed" by Lack of Darkness in Latest Harry Potter Movie.
    • ihaterowling

      07/20/09 02:24 AM
      I was so disappointed by the major additions and eliminations of this movie!
      1. WTH was the deal with the muggle chick in that dirty diner at the beginning of the movie? Everyone knows Harry barely left his room in the few short weeks he was at the Dursley's because he was mourning Sirius! AND Dumbledore came and got him! Harry did NOT randomly run into him in a subway!
      2. THE WEASLEY'S HOUSE NEVER GETS BURNED DOWN! EVER!! The entire beginning of Deathly Hallows takes place there and Bill and Fleur's wedding is held there!! HELLO??!!
      3. ALL POTTER READERS are disappointed in the way the events surrounding Dumbledore's death were portrayed. Harry did not just stand there and watch willingly; Dumbledore froze him PREVENTING him from taking action. And what happened to the battle between the Death Eaters and the Order outside the tower where Dumbledore was killed?? And what happened to his funeral??
      There wouold have been plenty of time for all this if so much time wasn't spent on that stupid chick who was swooning over Ron...
      Rowling should be ashamed for allowing the movie makers to change her books....even though she sucks for pretty much killing everyone off anyway.
      Review Rating: 0
      Characters remaining:
      Submit Cancel
    See the most recent outtakes

Movie News

Movie News is our take on the world of movies. Every day our crack staff reports on what's happening, what's worth watching, and what should've never been made in the first place.

Got a scoop?  Email us at news@reelzchannel.com.

reelz video highlight

We talk to the director and stars of 2012, including John Cusack, Amanda Peet, and Roland Emmerich, at the movie's premiere.

 
NEW MOVIE RELEASES
2009 |  2010 |  2011 |  2012
PAGES ON OUR
© 2009 ReelzChannel